• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Học liệu mở OER
    • Education
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Học liệu mở OER
    • Education
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Open research practices

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    0273_Openresearchpractices.pdf (417.2Kb)
    Date
    2016
    Author
    D. V. M. Bishop
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative (PROI) is a move to enlist reviewers in the promotion of data-sharing. In this commentary, I discuss objections that can be raised, first to the specific proposals in the PROI, and second to data-sharing in general. I argue that although many objections have strong counter-arguments, others merit more serious consideration. Regarding the PROI, I suggest that it could backfire if editors and authors feel coerced into data-sharing and so may not be the most pragmatic way of encouraging greater openness. More generally, while promoting data-sharing, we need to be sensitive to cases where sharing of data from human participants could create ethical problems. Furthermore, those interested in promoting reproducible science need to defend against an increased risk of data-dredging when large, multivariable datasets are shared. I end with some suggestions to avoid these unintended consequences.
    URI
    https://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/21907
    Collections
    • Education [806]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV