Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGwartney, James Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-24T05:21:34Z
dc.date.available2017-10-24T05:21:34Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.isbn0538754281en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9780538754286en_US
dc.identifier.otherHPU5160671en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/27890
dc.description.abstractUntil the 1970s, there was a consensus in applied macroeconometrics, both regarding the theoretical foundation and the empirical specification of macroeconometric modelling, commonly known as the Cowles Commission approach. This is no longer the case: the Cowles Commission approach broke down in the 1970s, replaced by three prominent competing methods of empirical research: the LSE (London School of Economics) approach, the VAR approach, and the intertemporal optimization/Real Business Cycle approach. This book discusses and illustrates the empirical research strategy of these three alternative approaches by interpreting them as different proposals to solve problems observed in the Cowles Commission approach Part 1. The economic way of thinking -- Part 2. Markets and government -- Part 3. Core macroeconomics -- Part 4. International economics -- Part 5. Applying the basics: special topics in economicsen_US
dc.format.extent624 p.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCengage Learningen_US
dc.subjectMacroeconomicsen_US
dc.subjectEconomicsen_US
dc.subjectMacroeconometric modellingen_US
dc.titleUS RDA TEST COPY RECORD GSLIS7 Macroeconomics : private and public choiceen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
dc.size21,023Kben_US
dc.departmentSociologyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record