Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNarbonne, Jean-Marcen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-20T03:50:32Z
dc.date.available2017-09-20T03:50:32Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9004203265en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9789004203266en_US
dc.identifier.otherHPU4161376en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/26799
dc.description.abstractThe studies here proposed, while each covering a different theme, share nonetheless a commonpoint which is absolutely central to all: they come to light when seen froma perspectivewhich, as Treatise reveals, stems from an anti-Gnostic position. Ever since R. Harder’s famous article,1 it has been the rule to think that what could be called “the Gnosticfile”or the “Gnosticdisagreement” actually occupied a clearly delimited space in the Plotinian corpus: treatises  to , whichhave since been commonly referred to asdie Großscrhift, 2 as if the controversy with the Gnostics,save for the oddmarginal scuffle, was simply themark of a single period, among other comparable periods, staked out over Plotinus’ intellectual career.en_US
dc.format.extent165 p.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrill Academic Publishersen_US
dc.subjectGnosticsen_US
dc.subjectPlotinusen_US
dc.subjectDialogueen_US
dc.titlePlotinus in Dialogue with the Gnosticsen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
dc.size1.87Mben_US
dc.departmentSociologyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record