Detection dog efficacy for collecting faecal samples from the critically endangered Cross River gorilla for genetic censusing
dc.contributor.author | Arandjelovic, Mimi | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bergl, Richard A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ikfuingei, Romanus | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-30T01:39:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-07-30T01:39:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | HPU4160489 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/22384 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Population estimates using genetic capture–recapture methods from non-invasively collected wildlife samples are more accurate and precise than those obtained from traditional methods when detection and resampling rates are high. Recently, detection dogs have been increasingly used to find elusive species and their by-products. Here we compared the effectiveness of dog- and human-directed searches for Cross River gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli) faeces at two sites. The critically endangered Cross River gorilla inhabits a region of high biodiversity and endemism on the border between Nigeria and Cameroon. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 14 p. | en_US |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | Biology | en_US |
dc.subject | Ecology | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental science | en_US |
dc.subject | Genetics | en_US |
dc.subject | Apes | en_US |
dc.subject | Primates | en_US |
dc.subject | Microsatellite | en_US |
dc.subject | Genotyping | en_US |
dc.subject | Canine | en_US |
dc.title | Detection dog efficacy for collecting faecal samples from the critically endangered Cross River gorilla for genetic censusing | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.size | 0.97MB | en_US |
dc.department | Education | en_US |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Education [806]