Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLoiselle, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRamchandra, R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-11T05:37:46Z
dc.date.available2016-10-11T05:37:46Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.otherHPU4160582en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/23663en_US
dc.description.abstractIn commenting on the instructive, comprehensive and entertainingly written article by Prof. Colquhoun (hereinafter referred to as ‘the author’), we state unequivocally that we have no truck with its motivation. Indeed, we too often find the Fisherian approach troubling. Nor do we wish to become involved in the relative merits of ‘Bayesian’ versus ‘Fisherian’ methods.en_US
dc.format.extent4 p.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectMathematicsen_US
dc.subjectMisinterpretationen_US
dc.subjectDiscovery rateen_US
dc.subjectInvestigationen_US
dc.titleA counterview of ‘An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values’ by Colquhounen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.size357KBen_US
dc.departmentEducationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record