Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPolak, Talen_US
dc.contributor.authorWatson, James E.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFuller, Richard A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-11T05:37:38Z
dc.date.available2016-10-11T05:37:38Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.otherHPU4160552en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/23630en_US
dc.description.abstractThe Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)’s strategic plan advocates the use of environmental surrogates, such as ecosystems, as a basis for planning where new protected areas should be placed. However, the efficiency and effectiveness of this ecosystem-based planning approach to adequately capture threatened species in protected area networks is unknown. We tested the application of this approach in Australia according to the nation’s CBD-inspired goals for expansion of the national protected area system.en_US
dc.format.extent11 p.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectBiologyen_US
dc.subjectEcologyen_US
dc.subjectEcosystem-based targetsen_US
dc.subjectSurrogacyen_US
dc.subjectSpatial prioritizationen_US
dc.subjectGeographical range sizeen_US
dc.subjectAdequacyen_US
dc.subjectRepresentationen_US
dc.titleEfficient expansion of global protected areas requires simultaneous planning for species and ecosystemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.size610KBen_US
dc.departmentEducationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record