Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSiepielski, Adam M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFallon, Ericen_US
dc.contributor.authorBoersma, Kateen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-11T05:37:21Z
dc.date.available2016-10-11T05:37:21Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.otherHPU4160680en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/23571en_US
dc.description.abstractMost animals are faced with the challenge of securing food under the risk of predation. This frequently generates a trade-off whereby animals respond to predator cues with reduced movement to avoid predation at the direct cost of reduced foraging success. However, predators may also cause prey to be apprehensive in their foraging activities, which would generate an indirect ‘apprehension cost’. Apprehension arises when a forager redirects attention from foraging tasks to predatordetection and incurs a cost from such multi-tasking, because the forager ends up making more mistakes in its foraging tasks as a result.en_US
dc.format.extent7 p.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectBiologyen_US
dc.subjectBehaviouren_US
dc.subjectEcologyen_US
dc.subjectPredatorsen_US
dc.subjectCuesen_US
dc.subjectPredation risken_US
dc.titlePredator olfactory cues generate a foraging–predation trade-off through prey apprehensionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.size369KBen_US
dc.departmentEducationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record