Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/28601
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHopgood, Stephenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-26T02:55:36Z
dc.date.available2017-12-26T02:55:36Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.isbn0801452376en_US
dc.identifier.isbn1501700669en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9780801452376en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781501700668en_US
dc.identifier.otherHPU4161837en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/28601-
dc.description.abstractIn a book that is at once passionate and provocative, Stephen Hopgood argues, against the conventional wisdom, that the idea of universal human rights has become not only ill adapted to current realities but also overambitious and unresponsive. A shift in the global balance of power away from the United States further undermines the foundations on which the global human rights regime is based. American decline exposes the contradictions, hypocrisies and weaknesses behind the attempt to enforce this regime around the world and opens the way for resurgent religious and sovereign actors to challenge human rights. Historically, Hopgood writes, universal humanist norms inspired a sense of secular religiosity among the new middle classes of a rapidly modernizing Europe. Human rights were the product of a particular worldview (Western European and Christian) and specific historical moments (humanitarianism in the nineteenth century, the aftermath of the Holocaust). They were an antidote to a troubling contradiction—the coexistence of a belief in progress with horrifying violence and growing inequality. The obsolescence of that founding purpose in the modern globalized world has, Hopgood asserts, transformed the institutions created to perform it, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross and recently the International Criminal Court, into self-perpetuating structures of intermittent power and authority that mask their lack of democratic legitimacy and systematic ineffectiveness. At their best, they provide relief in extraordinary situations of great distress, otherwise they are serving up a mixture of false ho e and unaccountability sustained by "human rights" as a global brand. The Endtimes of Human Rights is sure to be controversial. Hopgood makes a plea for a new understanding of where hope lies for human rights, a plea that mourns the promise but rejects the reality of universalism in favor of a less predictable encounter with the diverse realities of today's multipolar world.en_US
dc.format.extent272 p.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCornell University Pressen_US
dc.subjectHuman Rightsen_US
dc.subjectEndtimesen_US
dc.subjectEndtimes of Human Rightsen_US
dc.titleThe Endtimes of Human Rightsen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
dc.size1.88Mben_US
dc.departmentSociologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Sociology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The-Endtimes-of-Human-Rights-1822.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.94 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.