Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/26780
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGleede, Benjaminen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-20T03:50:22Z
dc.date.available2017-09-20T03:50:22Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.isbn900422419Xen_US
dc.identifier.isbn9789004224193en_US
dc.identifier.otherHPU4161395en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/26780-
dc.description.abstractExamining the usage of the term ἐνυπόστατος both in the trinitarian debates before Chalcedon and especially the Christological ones afterwards, this study illustrates the gradual, yet profound change in its meaning initiated by Leontius of Byzantium: In distinguishing between the hypostasis and the ἐνυπόστατον Leontius initiates a crucial shift in that an ἐνυπόστατον is no longer straightforwardly considered as a proper, independent hypostasis of its own, but as something realized in a hypostasis which is by no means necessarily endowed with a hypostasis of its own. This technical discussion of the term is accompanied by an attempt at classifying the entirety of the different usages it keeps on displaying despite its Christian theological origin and its outstanding importance during the post-chalcedonian Christological debates.en_US
dc.format.extent223 p.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrill Academic Publishersen_US
dc.subjectDamascusen_US
dc.subjectTrinitarian debatesen_US
dc.subjectOrigenen_US
dc.titleThe Development of the Term ἐνυπόστατος from Origen to John of Damascusen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
dc.size1.35Mben_US
dc.departmentSociologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Sociology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1278_The_Development_of_the_Term.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.38 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.