Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/23690
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorColquhoun, Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-11T05:37:53Z
dc.date.available2016-10-11T05:37:53Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.otherHPU4160607en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/23690-
dc.description.abstractI thank Loiselle and Ramchandra (hereafter ‘the authors’) for their interest. First, I should say that it might have been a mistake to use the term ‘false discovery rate’. This is so because the same term is used in the world of multiple comparison studies. It is defined there in the same way as in my paper, but the context is quite different. Corrections for multiple comparisons all give simply thep-value if applied to a single experiment, so they take no account of the false-positive rate that is discussed in my paper.en_US
dc.format.extent2 p.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectMathematicsen_US
dc.subjectLoiselleen_US
dc.subjectRamchandraen_US
dc.titleResponse to comment by Loiselle & Ramchandraen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.size246KBen_US
dc.departmentEducationen_US
Appears in Collections:Education

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
0490_Response.pdf
  Restricted Access
246.98 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.