Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/22423
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCantor, Maurícioen_US
dc.contributor.authorGero, Shaneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-30T01:39:24Z
dc.date.available2016-07-30T01:39:24Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.otherHPU4160524en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/22423-
dc.description.abstractThe number of contributing reviewers often outnumbers the authors of publications. This has led to apathy towards reviewing and the conclusion that the peer-review system is broken. Given the trade-offs between submitting and reviewing manuscripts, reviewers and authors naturally want visibility for their efforts. While study after study has called for revolutionizing publication practices, the current paradigm does not recognize reviewers’ time and expertise. We propose the R-indexasasimpleway to quantify scientists’ contributions as reviewers.en_US
dc.format.extent7 p.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectTheoretical biologyen_US
dc.subjectPeer-reviewen_US
dc.subjectPublication practicesen_US
dc.subjectScience policyen_US
dc.subjectIndexen_US
dc.subjectSciencemetricsen_US
dc.subjectResearch assessmenten_US
dc.titleThe missing metricen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.size813KBen_US
dc.departmentEducationen_US
Appears in Collections:Education

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
0407_Themissingmetric.pdf
  Restricted Access
813.38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.