Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/22384
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArandjelovic, Mimien_US
dc.contributor.authorBergl, Richard A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIkfuingei, Romanusen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-30T01:39:18Z
dc.date.available2016-07-30T01:39:18Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.otherHPU4160489en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/22384en_US
dc.description.abstractPopulation estimates using genetic capture–recapture methods from non-invasively collected wildlife samples are more accurate and precise than those obtained from traditional methods when detection and resampling rates are high. Recently, detection dogs have been increasingly used to find elusive species and their by-products. Here we compared the effectiveness of dog- and human-directed searches for Cross River gorilla (Gorilla gorilla diehli) faeces at two sites. The critically endangered Cross River gorilla inhabits a region of high biodiversity and endemism on the border between Nigeria and Cameroon.en_US
dc.format.extent14 p.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectBiologyen_US
dc.subjectEcologyen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental scienceen_US
dc.subjectGeneticsen_US
dc.subjectApesen_US
dc.subjectPrimatesen_US
dc.subjectMicrosatelliteen_US
dc.subjectGenotypingen_US
dc.subjectCanineen_US
dc.titleDetection dog efficacy for collecting faecal samples from the critically endangered Cross River gorilla for genetic censusingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.size0.97MBen_US
dc.departmentEducationen_US
Appears in Collections:Education

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
0372_Detectiondogefficacy.pdf
  Restricted Access
1 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.