The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/21750

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Cantor, Maurício	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Gero, Shane	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2016-06-25T01:57:23Z
dc.date.available	2016-06-25T01:57:23Z
dc.date.issued	2015	en_US
dc.identifier.other	HPU4160247	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	https://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/21750	en_US
dc.description.abstract	The number of contributing reviewers often outnumbers the authors of publications. This has led to apathy towards reviewing and the conclusion that the peer-review system is broken. Given the trade-offs between submitting and reviewing manuscripts, reviewers and authors naturally want visibility for their efforts. While study after study has called for revolutionizing publication practices, the current paradigm does not recognize reviewers’ time and expertise.	en_US
dc.format.extent	7 p.	en_US
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	The Royal Society	en_US
dc.subject	Theoretical biology	en_US
dc.subject	Publication practices	en_US
dc.subject	Science	en_US
dc.subject	Policy	en_US
dc.subject	Sciencemetrics	en_US
dc.subject	Assessment	en_US
dc.title	The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers	en_US
dc.type	Book	en_US
dc.size	813KB	en_US
dc.department	Education	en_US
Appears in Collections:	Education

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
0130_Themissingmetric.pdf Restricted Access		813.39 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open Request a copy

DSpace JSPUI